Statistical analysis of the effect of CME-diesel blends on the performance of a light duty common rail direct injection engine
By: Denoga, Gerald Jo C [author]
Contributor(s): Balbarona, Juvy A [author] | Mercado, Jose Gabriel E [author]
Copyright date: 2017Subject(s): Biodiesel fuels In: Philippine Engineering Journal vol. 38, no. 2: (December 2017), pages 31-42Abstract: This paper presents the effect of coconut methyl ester (CME) biodiesel blends in the performance of a light duty automotive common rail direct injection engine. Total of six fuel blends – B0 (Neat Diesel), B2 (2%CME, 98%B0), B5 (5% CME, 95%B0), B10 (10%CME, 90%B0), B15 (15%CME, 85%B0) and B20 (20%CME, 80% B0) were tested for performance at 100% load with varying speeds from 800 RPM to 2400 RPM at an interval of 400 RPM. At this typical engine speed range, no significant differences for biodiesel blends versus neat diesel were observed for torque.| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JOURNAL ARTICLE
|
COLLEGE LIBRARY | COLLEGE LIBRARY PERIODICALS | Not for loan |
This paper presents the effect of coconut methyl ester (CME) biodiesel blends in the performance of a light duty automotive common rail direct injection engine. Total of six fuel blends – B0 (Neat Diesel), B2 (2%CME, 98%B0), B5 (5% CME, 95%B0), B10 (10%CME, 90%B0), B15 (15%CME, 85%B0) and B20 (20%CME, 80% B0) were tested for performance at 100% load with varying speeds from 800 RPM to 2400 RPM at an interval of 400 RPM. At this typical engine speed range, no significant differences for biodiesel blends versus neat diesel were observed for torque.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.