000 | 02074cam a22004094a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c73891 _d73891 |
||
001 | 13767324 | ||
003 | CITU | ||
005 | 20230118105630.0 | ||
008 | 041101s2005 mau b 001 0 eng | ||
010 | _a 2004060692 | ||
020 | _a0674016785 (alk. paper) | ||
020 | _a9780674016781 | ||
040 |
_aCITU LRAC _ceng |
||
042 | _apcc | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aH61 _b.T63 2005 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a300.72 _222 |
100 | 1 |
_aTopper, Keith Lewis, _d1958- _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe disorder of political inquiry / _cKeith Topper. |
264 | 1 |
_aCambridge, Massachusetts : _bHarvard University Press, _c2005. |
|
300 |
_axi, 322 pages ; _c25 cm. |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_bn _2rdamedia _aunmediated |
||
338 |
_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
500 | _aIncludes index | ||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 219-313) | ||
505 | _aThe social science wars -- Science turned upside down -- In defense of disunity -- The politics of disunity -- The politics of redescription -- Reclaiming the language of emancipation -- Sciences that disturb -- Conclusion: pluralism, power, Perestroika, and political inquiry. | ||
520 | _a "Engaging the work of thinkers such as Richard Rorty, Charles Taylor, Pierre Bourdieu, Roy Bhaskar, and Hannah Arendt, as well as recent literature in political science and the history and philosophy of science, Topper proposes a pluralist, normative, and broadly pragmatist conception of political inquiry, one that is analytically rigorous yet alive to the notorious vagaries, idiosyncrasies, and messy uncertainties of political life." | ||
650 | 0 |
_aSocial sciences _xMethodology. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aSocial sciences _xPhilosophy. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aPolitical science _xMethodology. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aPolitical science _xPhilosophy. |
|
650 | 0 | _aNaturalism. | |
650 | 0 | _aPower (Social sciences) | |
906 |
_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eocip _f20 _gy-gencatlg |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cBK |