Taking sides. Clashing views in human sexuality / selected, edited, and with introductions by William J. Taverner.
Contributor(s): Mckee, Ryan W. [editor] | Taverner, William J [editor]
Language: English Series: McGraw-Hill contemporary learning series.; Taking sidesPublisher: Dubuque, Iowa : McGraw-Hill, c2008Edition: Tenth editionDescription: xxiv, 343 pages ; 23 cmContent type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: 0073397199 ; 9780073397191Subject(s): Sex customs -- United States | Sexual ethics -- United States | Sex (Psychology) | Sex | Sexual orientationDDC classification: 306.70973Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOOK | COLLEGE LIBRARY | COLLEGE LIBRARY SUBJECT REFERENCE | 306.70973 T139 2008 (Browse shelf) | Available | CITU-CL-43356 |
pt. 1. The nature of sex --
Can sex be addictive? --
Is oral sex really sex? --
Is Masters and Johnson's model an accurate description of sexual response? --
Is the G spot a myth? --
Is the testosterone patch the right cure for low libido in women? --
pt. 2. Sex and schools --
Does the availability of "sexual health services" make some college campuses healthier than others? --
Should Sex Ed teach about abstinence? --
Should children have an HPV vaccination before they enroll in school? --
Do schools perpetuate a gender bias? --
pt. 3. Reproduction technology --
Should parents be allowed to select the sex of their baby? --
Should emergency contraception be available over the counter? --
Should federal funding of stem cell research be restricted? --
pt. 4. Sex and society --
Should same sex-marriage [sic] be legal? --
Should society support cohabitation before marriage? --
Is pedophilia always harmful? --
Should female circumcision be banned? --
Should the FCC restrict broadcast "indecency"? --
Should sexual content on the internet be restricted?
A debate-style reader provides an introduction to controversial issues in human sexuality, followed by arguments presenting opposing viewpoints on the topic.
There are no comments for this item.