A meta-analysis of work-family conflict and social support (Record no. 84160)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02350nab a22001937a 4500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20230204083109.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 230203b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Preferred name for the person French, Kimberly A.
Relator term author
245 12 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title A meta-analysis of work-family conflict and social support
264 #4 - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2018
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc The relationship between social support and work-family conflict is well-established, but the notion that different forms, sources, and types of social support as well as contextual factors can alter this relationship has been relatively neglected. To address this limitation, the current study provides the most comprehensive and in-depth examination of the relationship between social support and work-family conflict to date. We conduct a meta-analysis based on 1021 effect sizes and 46 countries to dissect the social support and work-family conflict relationship. Using social support theory as a theoretical framework, we challenge the assumption that social support measures are interchangeable by comparing work/family support relationships with work-family conflict across different support forms (behavior, perceptions), sources (e.g., supervisor, coworker, spouse), types (instrumental, emotional), and national contexts (cultural values, economic factors). National context hypotheses use a strong inferences paradigm in which utility and value congruence theoretical perspectives are pitted against one another. Significant results concerning support source are in line with social support theory, indicating that broad sources of support are more strongly related to work-family conflict than are specific sources of support. In line with utility perspective from social support theory, culture and economic national context significantly moderate some of the relationships between work/family support and work interference with family, indicating that social support is most beneficial in contexts in which it is needed or perceived as useful. The results suggest that organizational support may be the most important source of support overall.
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Work family
650 #2 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Social support
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Allen, Tammy D.
Relator term author
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Dumani, Soner
Relator term author
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Shockley, Kristen M.
Relator term author
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Psychological Bulletin
Relationship information vol. 144, no. 3: (March 2018), pages 284-314
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS
Source of classification or shelving scheme
Item type JOURNAL ARTICLE
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Shelving location Date acquired Date last seen Price effective from Item type
          COLLEGE LIBRARY COLLEGE LIBRARY PERIODICALS 2023-02-03 2023-02-03 2023-02-03 JOURNAL ARTICLE