Meta-analytic review of two modes of learning and the description-experience gap (Record no. 84156)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02426nab a22001937a 4500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20230203103934.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 230203b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Preferred name for the person Wulff, Dirk U.
Relator term author
245 12 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Meta-analytic review of two modes of learning and the description-experience gap
264 #1 - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2018
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc People can learn about the probabilistic consequences of their actions in two ways: One is by consulting descriptions of an action's consequences and probabilities (e.g., reading up on a medication's side effects). The other is by personally experiencing the probabilistic consequences of an action (e.g., beta testing software). In principle, people taking each route can reach analogous states of knowledge and consequently make analogous decisions. In the last dozen years, however, research has demonstrated systematic discrepancies between description- and experienced-based choices. This description-experience gap has been attributed to factors including reliance on a small set of experience, the impact of recency, and different weighting of probability information in the two decision types. In this meta-analysis focusing on studies using the sampling paradigm of decisions from experience, we evaluated these and other determinants of the decision-experience gap by reference to more than 70,000 choices made by more than 6,000 participants. We found, first, a robust description-experience gap but also a key moderator, namely, problem structure. Second, the largest determinant of the gap was reliance on small samples and the associated sampling error: free to terminate search, individuals explored too little to experience all possible outcomes. Third, the gap persisted when sampling error was basically eliminated, suggesting other determinants. Fourth, the occurrence of recency was contingent on decision makers' autonomy to terminate search, consistent with the notion of optional stopping. Finally, we found indications of different probability weighting in decisions from experience versus decisions from description when the problem structure involved a risky and a safe option.
650 #1 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Learning--Psychology
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Experiential learning.
654 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--FACETED TOPICAL TERM
Focus term Meta-analysis
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Mergenthaler-Canseco, Max
Relator term author
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Hertwig, Ralph
Relator term author
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Psychological Bulletin
Relationship information vol. 144, no. 2: (February 2018), pages 140-176
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS
Source of classification or shelving scheme
Item type JOURNAL ARTICLE
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Shelving location Date acquired Date last seen Price effective from Item type
          COLLEGE LIBRARY COLLEGE LIBRARY PERIODICALS 2023-02-03 2023-02-03 2023-02-03 JOURNAL ARTICLE