| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01266nab a22001577a 4500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
|---|
| control field |
20230201160254.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
230201b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Preferred name for the person |
Paglinawan, Dixi M. |
| Relator term |
author |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Comparison of regression estimator and ratio estimator: a simulation study |
| 264 #4 - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
|---|
| Date of publication, distribution, etc |
2017 |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc |
We compared ratio and regression estimators empirically based on bias and coefficient of variation. Simulation studies accounting for sampling rate, population size, heterogeneity of the auxiliary variable x, deviation from linearity and model misspecification were conducted. The study shows that ratio estimator is better than regression estimators when regression line is close to the origin. Ratio and regression estimators still work even if there is a weak linear relationship between x and y, provided that there is minimal, if not absent, model misspecification. When the relationship between the target variable and the auxiliary variable is very weak, bootstrap estimates yield lower bias. Regression estimator is generally more efficient than ratio estimator. |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Bootstrap (Statistics) |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Sampling (Statistics) |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Title |
The Philippine Statistician |
| Relationship information |
vol. 66, no. 1: (2017), pages 49-57 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS |
|---|
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
|
| Item type |
JOURNAL ARTICLE |